The Lord's Supper
- The Lords Supper, by R. L. Dabney The grounds on which Rome withholds the cup from the laity may be seen stated in the Council of Trent ... They are too trivial to need refutation. It is enough to say that the assertion that the bread by itself is a whole sacrament, because the blood is in the body, is false.... We might justly ask: Why is not the bread alone sufficient for the priests also, if it is a whole sacrament? The outrage upon Christ's institute is peculiarly glaring, because the injunction to give the cup to the communicants is as clear and positive as to observe the sacrament at all. And our Savior, as though foreseeing the abuse, in Mark xiv: 23, and Matt xxvi: 27, has emphatically declared that all who eat are also to drink. This innovation of Rome is comparatively modern; being not more against the Word of God, than against the voice and usage of Christian antiquity. It presents one of the strongest examples of her insolent arrogance both towards her people and God. The true motive, doubtless, is, to exalt the priesthood into a superior caste.
- Lecture 5A - "The Lord's Supper" - Confessional and Biblical Concerns
Dr. Kim Riddlebarger
- Lecture 5B - "The Lord's Supper" - Confessional and Biblical Concerns